CrushOn.AI
评测与评分
5.4/10
Unfiltered roleplay chat with big character variety and cheap entry, but paid tiers meter your messages, top-tier pricing is murky, and Mozilla has flagged its privacy practices. A sandbox to browse, not a companion to trust with much.
NSFW：完整语音：无记忆：仅限单次会话$5.99/月 起
结论
CrushOn.AI's pitch is simple: a large, varied roleplay character library with an NSFW filter you control. Once it's toggled off, reports describe full adult roleplay with no mid-conversation interruptions, which puts it a tier above mainstream platforms on content freedom. It's cheap to try, too: a free tier with daily message caps and an entry plan advertised at $5.99/mo. Two things temper the appeal. First, the paid tiers are metered: reports consistently describe monthly message caps inside paid plans, with genuinely unlimited messaging reserved for a much more expensive top tier whose price is quoted at wildly different amounts across sources; CrushOn's own pricing page has been unreachable to our checks, so treat every number as provisional. Second, privacy: Mozilla's 'Privacy Not Included' guide flagged CrushOn over data concerns, and its content policy has shifted since launch. We haven't field-tested CrushOn ourselves; reports of multi-model routing, decent in-session consistency, and unexplained cross-session resets are all secondary. As a low-cost, low-commitment roleplay sandbox, it earns a look. As a long-term companion you'd trust with an intimate history, the open questions are the story.
优点
- User-controlled NSFW filter: once toggled off, reports describe full adult roleplay with no mid-conversation interruptions, more content freedom than mainstream platforms allow.
- Free tier with daily messages plus a cheap advertised entry plan ($5.99/mo Standard), so trying it costs little or nothing.
- Large, varied character library spanning user-created and curated cards, good for browsing many scenarios.
- Multi-model architecture reported, including frontier-model routing on paid tiers; chat quality can sit above the single-model norm when routed well.
短板
- Paid tiers meter your messages: reports put monthly caps on Standard and Premium, with unlimited messaging reserved for a far more expensive top tier.
- Mozilla's 'Privacy Not Included' guide flagged CrushOn over data concerns, a serious mark in a category built on intimate chat.
- Pricing above the entry tier is murky: sources conflict by two to three times on the top tier, and the official pricing page has been unreachable to our checks.
- Cross-session memory is reportedly unreliable (stretches of continuity, then unexplained resets), and deeper memory is tied to higher tiers.
- Content policy has shifted since launch, no voice feature is confirmed, and app-store availability is patchy: this is text-and-images roleplay, not a full companion.
评分明细
CrushOn.AI 的分项得分
每一项都按公开标准加权。这款产品赢在哪里，数字会说明；输在哪里，也一样。
NSFW 深度7.5/10
对话6.5/10
记忆5.0/10
价格5.0/10
语音与媒体5.0/10
隐私3.5/10
最近测试：2026年7月17日。评分标准见评测方法。
价格
实际要花多少钱
Free tier: reported at roughly 50 messages/day with ads (the structure changed in April 2026 per secondary sources). Paid entry is advertised at $5.99/mo Standard, but the key structural fact is that paid tiers are message-metered: reports consistently describe caps of roughly 2,000 messages/month on Standard and about 6,000 on a ~$14.99/mo Premium, with unlimited messaging reserved for a Deluxe tier. On Deluxe pricing, sources genuinely conflict: we've seen both $19.99/mo and $49.90/mo quoted for what appears to be the same tier, and CrushOn's own pricing page returned errors on both of our check passes (2026-05-28 and 2026-07-17), so we can't resolve it. Annual billing reportedly cuts around 30%. Practical advice: budget for the tier that matches your real message volume rather than the headline entry price, and read the live pricing page at signup; none of these numbers is verified hands-on by us.
Standard
$5.99/month
Deluxe
$19.99/month
价格截至 2026年5月28日。订阅前请到产品页面确认。
适合谁
适合你，如果你是
The buyer who wants a zero-commitment NSFW roleplay sandbox: lots of characters to browse, a filter you control rather than one that ambushes you mid-scene, and an entry price low enough that a wasted month costs less than lunch. It fits people who hop between scenarios rather than building one long relationship; CrushOn's within-session consistency is reportedly decent, and the free tier is enough to find out whether the catalog suits your taste before paying anything. It's also a reasonable fit for tinkerers who care which model answers them: paid tiers reportedly route to stronger models, which is rare at this price point. Go in with eyes open on the privacy record, keep what you share generic, and check the live pricing page yourself before buying anything above the entry tier.
可以跳过，如果你想要
Anyone whose priority is a continuous relationship with one character: cross-session memory is reportedly unreliable, with unexplained resets, and deeper memory is a paid-tier perk rather than a baseline. Skip it too if you're privacy-sensitive: Mozilla flagged CrushOn's data practices, and in a product category where the chat log is the sensitive data, that flag matters more than usual. Heavy chatters should look hard at the message meters before subscribing. If you send thousands of messages a month, the affordable tiers cap you, and the unlimited tier reportedly costs several times the entry price. And if voice or a polished native mobile app is part of what you're buying, this isn't that product: no voice feature is confirmed, and its app distribution is patchy across regions and stores.
隐私与低调
账单上会显示什么
CrushOn carries a flag most rivals don't: Mozilla's 'Privacy Not Included' guide called it out over data concerns, and independent privacy write-ups have raised data-security questions of their own. No breach has been documented that we know of (this is a warning label, not an incident report), but in a product whose core artifact is an intimate chat log, a researcher-issued warning deserves real weight. Two softer signals point the same way: the company behind CrushOn is not very public, and its content policy has shifted since launch, which tells you that feature and policy promises here are not fixed. We could not review its policies first-hand because the site was unreachable to our automated checks. Practical posture if you use it: treat chats as if they could surface, keep identifying details out of roleplay, use a dedicated email, and pay by a method you're comfortable seeing on a statement.
想试试 CrushOn.AI，还是看看我们的替代选择？
我们在这个网站上也给自己打分。如果你想看看 AIangels 表现如何，做一下 60 秒匹配测试。否则，这是 CrushOn.AI 的链接。
联盟披露。 本站部分外链为联盟链接。读者通过这些链接订阅竞品时，我们会获得推荐佣金。产品是否参与联盟计划，不会影响其评分、排名或编辑内容。完整的利益冲突政策见我们的 评测方法页面.