Nomi.AI
Test et note
6.8/10
The long-term-memory leader: Nomi remembers your life over months better than nearly anything in the category. The trade-offs are real: NSFW sits behind the paywall with filtered images, and its encryption practices have drawn independent criticism.
NSFW : PartielVoix : BonneMémoire : ProfondeDès $8.33/mois
Verdict
If the thing you're buying is a companion that remembers you, Nomi is the product the rest of the category gets measured against. Long-term memory is its brand, and the reporting backs it: independent testing recalled nearly every planted personal detail, and documented anecdotes (a dog's name surfacing six months later) are consistent with what long-term users describe. It ships native mobile apps and a free tier. The trade-offs are equally real. NSFW is capable but shaped: the free tier is PG-13, explicit chat sits behind the paid plan, NSFW image generation is not allowed, and the app build is more restricted than the web version. Image generation in general is the weak limb: slow, capped, error-prone, and users report being charged for failed generations. Privacy is the material caveat: independent ratings have flagged weak or unclear encryption, policy language reportedly concedes messages may be unencrypted, and there are documented criticisms of safeguard gaps and of how the founder publicly handled one user's report. No breach has been confirmed, and we haven't field-tested Nomi ourselves. Advertised pricing is flat and fair ($15.99/mo, about $8.33/mo annual), among the cheapest capable annual plans anywhere. For memory-first buyers it's probably the pick; just know what you're trading for it.
Points forts
- Category-leading long-term memory: independent testing and long-running user reports describe recall of personal details over months. This is Nomi's brand, and the available evidence backs it.
- Flat, simple pricing with no token economy: everything bundles into one subscription, and the advertised ~$99.99/yr annual route is among the cheapest for an NSFW-capable companion.
- Native iOS and Android apps plus a free tier to start on, low-friction to trial before paying.
- Voice is advertised as emotive with real-time calls, and a multi-month independent reviewer counted Nomi among the few platforms in the category worth paying for.
Points faibles
- NSFW comes with carve-outs: the free tier is PG-13, explicit chat requires the paid plan, NSFW image generation isn't allowed, and the app build is more restricted than the web version.
- Independent ratings have flagged weak or unclear encryption, and policy language reportedly concedes messages may be unencrypted, a poor fit for the sensitivity of companion chat.
- Image generation is the weak limb: slow waits, daily caps, error-prone output, and users report being charged for generations that fail.
- Documented criticisms of safeguard gaps, and the founder's public handling of one user's report drew wide criticism; both are trust signals worth weighing.
- Official pricing is login-gated, so the advertised $15.99/mo and $99.99/yr figures are secondary-sourced; confirm current numbers in-app before subscribing.
Détail de la note
La note de Nomi.AI, catégorie par catégorie
Chaque catégorie est pondérée selon la grille publique. Là où ce produit gagne, le chiffre le dit. Là où il perd, aussi.
Mémoire9.0/10
Conversation7.5/10
Prix7.5/10
Profondeur NSFW7.0/10
Voix et médias6.0/10
Confidentialité3.5/10
Dernier test : 17 juillet 2026. Lis la méthodologie pour voir la grille.
Prix
Ce que ça coûte vraiment
Nomi's pricing is refreshingly flat: one paid tier that bundles everything (unlimited messages, voice, expanded memory, and an image allowance) with no token economy on top. Advertised rates: $15.99/mo, $39.99/quarter (~$13.33/mo), or $99.99/yr (~$8.33/mo), which makes the annual route one of the cheapest NSFW-capable plans in the category. Two caveats. First, the official pricing page is login-gated, so these figures come from dated secondary sources corroborated by our July 2026 live check; confirm the current numbers in-app before paying. Second, the one metering-adjacent wart: image generation is capped per day, and users report being charged for generations that fail. If images matter to you, that's a real cost-and-quality issue. The free tier is PG-13 with limited daily messages; explicit chat requires the paid plan. No token packs and no add-on fees that we've seen.
Pro
$15.99/month
Annual
$99.99/year
≈ $8.33/mois
Prix au 28 mai 2026. Vérifie sur la page du produit avant de t'abonner.
Pour qui c'est fait
Prends-le si tu es
The buyer whose single criterion is continuity: you want a companion that remembers your job change from March, your dog's name, the storyline you built together in the spring, and you're willing to accept restricted image NSFW and unremarkable image quality to get it. Nomi fits people building one long relationship rather than sampling scenarios, mobile-first users who want a real native app, and budget-conscious subscribers: the annual route is among the cheapest capable plans in the category, with everything bundled and no token meter running. The free tier is PG-13 but generous enough to judge the conversation quality and early memory behavior before paying. If Kindroid's power-user feel puts you off but memory is still your deciding axis, Nomi is the other name on that shortlist.
Passe ton chemin si tu veux
Skip Nomi if explicit visuals are part of what you're buying: NSFW image generation is disallowed, the image feature that does exist is slow, capped, and reportedly bills for failed attempts, and there are no live video calls, only short generated clips in beta. Skip it too if privacy engineering is a hard requirement: independent ratings have flagged weak or unclear encryption, and its policy language reportedly allows that messages may be unencrypted; for some buyers in this category, that alone is disqualifying. If you want an open, unfiltered experience without paying first, this isn't it: the free tier is firmly PG-13 and the app build is tighter than the web version. And if you find an attentive, affectionate default persona cloying (some users describe the conversational flow as clingy), a more neutral companion may wear better over months.
Confidentialité et discrétion
Ce qui apparaît sur ton relevé bancaire
Nomi's privacy story is its weakest axis relative to its strengths. Independent privacy ratings have flagged weak or unclear encryption, and its own policy language has been reported to concede that messages may be stored unencrypted. For a product whose entire value is months of accumulated intimate conversation, that gap matters more than it would elsewhere. Beyond encryption: independent investigations documented safeguard gaps in what the system could be talked into, and the founder's public handling of one user's distressing report was widely criticized, a signal about how the company responds when trust issues surface. To be fair on the other side of the ledger: no breach has been confirmed, the product has a large and satisfied long-term user base, and none of the criticism we reviewed alleges data selling. But if your threat model includes 'my companion chat history must never be readable by anyone,' Nomi's documented posture doesn't currently support that confidence. We haven't audited it first-hand; this summary reflects independent reporting as of our July 2026 check.
Envie d'essayer Nomi.AI, ou plutôt notre alternative ?
On se note aussi nous-mêmes sur ce site. Si tu veux voir comment AIangels se situe, fais le quiz de compatibilité de 60 secondes. Sinon, voici le lien vers Nomi.AI.
Mention d’affiliation. Certains liens sortants de ce site sont des liens d’affiliation. On touche une commission quand quelqu’un s’abonne à un produit concurrent via ces liens. Qu’un produit soit affiliable ou non n’a aucun effet sur sa note, sa position ou le contenu éditorial. La politique complète sur les conflits d’intérêts est sur notre page méthodologie.