CrushOn.AIReview and score
Unfiltered roleplay chat with big character variety and cheap entry, but paid tiers meter your messages, top-tier pricing is murky, and Mozilla has flagged its privacy practices. A sandbox to browse, not a companion to trust with much.
CrushOn.AI's pitch is simple: a large, varied roleplay character library with an NSFW filter you control. Once it's toggled off, reports describe full adult roleplay with no mid-conversation interruptions, which puts it a tier above mainstream platforms on content freedom. It's cheap to try, too: a free tier with daily message caps and an entry plan advertised at $5.99/mo. Two things temper the appeal. First, the paid tiers are metered: reports consistently describe monthly message caps inside paid plans, with genuinely unlimited messaging reserved for a much more expensive top tier whose price is quoted at wildly different amounts across sources; CrushOn's own pricing page has been unreachable to our checks, so treat every number as provisional. Second, privacy: Mozilla's 'Privacy Not Included' guide flagged CrushOn over data concerns, and its content policy has shifted since launch. We haven't field-tested CrushOn ourselves; reports of multi-model routing, decent in-session consistency, and unexplained cross-session resets are all secondary. As a low-cost, low-commitment roleplay sandbox, it earns a look. As a long-term companion you'd trust with an intimate history, the open questions are the story.
Strengths
- User-controlled NSFW filter: once toggled off, reports describe full adult roleplay with no mid-conversation interruptions, more content freedom than mainstream platforms allow.
- Free tier with daily messages plus a cheap advertised entry plan ($5.99/mo Standard), so trying it costs little or nothing.
- Large, varied character library spanning user-created and curated cards, good for browsing many scenarios.
- Multi-model architecture reported, including frontier-model routing on paid tiers; chat quality can sit above the single-model norm when routed well.
Wounds
- Paid tiers meter your messages: reports put monthly caps on Standard and Premium, with unlimited messaging reserved for a far more expensive top tier.
- Mozilla's 'Privacy Not Included' guide flagged CrushOn over data concerns, a serious mark in a category built on intimate chat.
- Pricing above the entry tier is murky: sources conflict by two to three times on the top tier, and the official pricing page has been unreachable to our checks.
- Cross-session memory is reportedly unreliable (stretches of continuity, then unexplained resets), and deeper memory is tied to higher tiers.
- Content policy has shifted since launch, no voice feature is confirmed, and app-store availability is patchy: this is text-and-images roleplay, not a full companion.
How CrushOn.AI scored, category by category
Each category is weighted per the public rubric. Where this product wins, the number says so. Where it loses, same.
Last tested July 17, 2026. Read the methodology for the rubric.
What it actually costs
Free tier: reported at roughly 50 messages/day with ads (the structure changed in April 2026 per secondary sources). Paid entry is advertised at $5.99/mo Standard, but the key structural fact is that paid tiers are message-metered: reports consistently describe caps of roughly 2,000 messages/month on Standard and about 6,000 on a ~$14.99/mo Premium, with unlimited messaging reserved for a Deluxe tier. On Deluxe pricing, sources genuinely conflict: we've seen both $19.99/mo and $49.90/mo quoted for what appears to be the same tier, and CrushOn's own pricing page returned errors on both of our check passes (2026-05-28 and 2026-07-17), so we can't resolve it. Annual billing reportedly cuts around 30%. Practical advice: budget for the tier that matches your real message volume rather than the headline entry price, and read the live pricing page at signup; none of these numbers is verified hands-on by us.
Pricing as of May 28, 2026. Verify on the product page before subscribing.
Buy if you are
The buyer who wants a zero-commitment NSFW roleplay sandbox: lots of characters to browse, a filter you control rather than one that ambushes you mid-scene, and an entry price low enough that a wasted month costs less than lunch. It fits people who hop between scenarios rather than building one long relationship; CrushOn's within-session consistency is reportedly decent, and the free tier is enough to find out whether the catalog suits your taste before paying anything. It's also a reasonable fit for tinkerers who care which model answers them: paid tiers reportedly route to stronger models, which is rare at this price point. Go in with eyes open on the privacy record, keep what you share generic, and check the live pricing page yourself before buying anything above the entry tier.
Skip if you want
Anyone whose priority is a continuous relationship with one character: cross-session memory is reportedly unreliable, with unexplained resets, and deeper memory is a paid-tier perk rather than a baseline. Skip it too if you're privacy-sensitive: Mozilla flagged CrushOn's data practices, and in a product category where the chat log is the sensitive data, that flag matters more than usual. Heavy chatters should look hard at the message meters before subscribing. If you send thousands of messages a month, the affordable tiers cap you, and the unlimited tier reportedly costs several times the entry price. And if voice or a polished native mobile app is part of what you're buying, this isn't that product: no voice feature is confirmed, and its app distribution is patchy across regions and stores.
What a billing statement looks like
CrushOn carries a flag most rivals don't: Mozilla's 'Privacy Not Included' guide called it out over data concerns, and independent privacy write-ups have raised data-security questions of their own. No breach has been documented that we know of (this is a warning label, not an incident report), but in a product whose core artifact is an intimate chat log, a researcher-issued warning deserves real weight. Two softer signals point the same way: the company behind CrushOn is not very public, and its content policy has shifted since launch, which tells you that feature and policy promises here are not fixed. We could not review its policies first-hand because the site was unreachable to our automated checks. Practical posture if you use it: treat chats as if they could surface, keep identifying details out of roleplay, use a dedicated email, and pay by a method you're comfortable seeing on a statement.
Want to try CrushOn.AI, or want our alternative?
We rank ourselves on this site too. If you want to see how AIangels compares, take the 60-second match quiz. Otherwise, here is the link to CrushOn.AI.
Affiliate disclosure. Some outbound links on this site are affiliate links. We earn a referral fee when readers subscribe to a competitor product through these links. Whether a product is affiliate-eligible has no effect on its score, position, or editorial content. The full conflict policy is on our methodology page.